Category Archives: UK Politics

European Union unemployment in & outside of the Eurozone – top 5 lowest in the zone


Just been reading an article in der Standand which has a little bit of good news for Austria, bad news for the Eurozone, and highlighting that those EU members – including the UK – outside the Euro aren’t exactly doing better when it comes to unemployment rates.

The good news for Austria is that not only did it still have the lowest unemployment of all 27 EU member states in September; it also had the lowest rate of youth unemployment after the figure fell to 7.5%.

Overall the Eurozone unemployment rate hit a new high, but before the usual voices in the UK start talking about how this proves they are so much better off, it’s worth noting that the top 5 for lowest unemployment are all Eurozone countries. The UK figure looks reasonable in comparison to many others inside and outside the Eurozone but it’s not exactly a spectacular success. Oh yes and let’s remember before the shout goes out that a UK exit from the EU would open up greater options in the ‘world market’, that the likes of Austria & Germany succeed in those markets as well as (like the UK) gaining form the single European market.

The unemployment figures below are taken from der Standard article.

Eurozone Member Unemployment Rate

Sept 2012

Outside Eurozone
Austria 4.4%  
Luxembourg 5.2%  
Germany 5.4%  
Netherlands 5.4%  
Malta 6.4%  
  6.8% Czech Republic
  7.1% Romania
Belgium 7.4%  
  7.8% Sweden
Finland 7.9%  
  7.9% UK
  8.1% Denmark
Slovenia 8.4%  
Estonia 10.0%  
  10.1% Poland
  10.6% Hungary
France 10.8%  
Italy 10.8%  
Cyprus 12.2%  
  12.4% Bulgaria
  13.9% Lithuania
Slovakia 13.9%  
Ireland 15.1%  
Portugal 15.7%  
  15.9% Latvia
Greece 25.1%  
Spain 25.8%  

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Austrian Economy, Austrian Politics, Politics, UK Politics, Vienna Life

Nuclear & Low Carbon debates – UK, Austria, EU


A few of the articles I’ve found of interest recently:

http://www.monbiot.com/2011/07/04/corporate-power-no-thanks/

http://austrianindependent.com/news/Business/2011-07-06/8324/%D6VP_aims_at_early_nuclear_energy_import_stop

http://www.libdemvoice.org/independent-view-nuclear-subsidies-no-thanks-24657.html

http://www.libdemvoice.org/lib-dem-mps-set-to-rebel-over-backdoor-nuclear-power-subsidy-24625.html

http://www.libdemvoice.org/chris-davies-mep-writes-conservatives-and-climate-change-tuesdays-revealing-vote-in-strasbourg-24634.html

http://www.libdems.org.uk/news_detail.aspx?title=Transport_boost_of_over_%C2%A3150M_to_create_growth_and_cut_carbon&pPK=9130d3c3-79ab-4af5-9aeb-f637cfdbafee

Leave a comment

Filed under Austrian Politics, Climate Change, Energy, Green, Liberal Politics, Politics, Transport, UK Politics

Nuclear Power No Thanks? – Have you talked to George Monbiot?


Austria is a country with strongly anti-nuclear sentiments. There are no nuclear power stations in the country. A referendum in 1978 came out narrowly against plans to build the country’s first Nuclear Plant in Zwentendorf, Lower Austria and I’m reasonable convinced that a similar popular vote today would be overwhelmingly opposed. In Austria it’s not just the Greens
who have anti-nuclear stickers, even the far right put their party label on the on the anti-nuclear logo.

Austrians have long had concerns, and campaigned about, the nuclear power plant across the border in the Czech Republic. This week sees reports of 204,000 people signing a petition organised by the Viennese Social Democrat Environment Councillor, Ulli Sima, against the expansion of a nuclear power plant in neighbouring Slovakia:

http://austrianindependent.com/news/Green_Austria/2009-12-08/120/Nuclear_plant_expansion_protest_backed_by_204%2C000_Viennese

On the European stage the Austrian Chancellor (for British readers – Prime Minister) Werner Faymann has called for a Europe with no nuclear power stations:

http://www.austriantimes.at/news/General_News/2011-05-10/33036/SP%D6_adamant_about_anti-nuclear_energy_course

Over recent months, I’ve been following with interest the energy debate in the UK and in particular the arguments aroused by George Monbiot, who has been taking a pro-nuclear stance from a green movement perspective. If you haven’t seen his articles on the subject I would definitely recommend you to take a look. I start from an anti-nuclear stance but an open mind. If you do read the article I’ve attached also read some of the comments posted below it and have a look at his previous contributions – not everyone pro or anti is exactly open minded, rational, or even just coherent when it comes to this debate.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/may/27/why-choose-nuclear-renewable-energy

George Monbiot is also well worth following on twitter -@GeorgeMonbiot

http://www.monbiot.com/

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Austrian Politics, Energy, Green, Politics, UK Politics

What Lib Dem’s think


Interesting picture of Lib Dem members attitudes:

http://www.politicshome.com/uk/article/27918/lib_dem_members_poll_shows_huge_dangers_for_clegg_in_nhs_reforms.html

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, UK Politics

Lib Dem’s are…


Interesting piece on Lib Dem identity:

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/notes/liberal-democrat-voice/how-lib-dem-members-describe-their-political-identity-liberal-progressive-and-so/10150172899962159

Leave a comment

Filed under Liberal Politics, Politics, UK Politics

Best AV video yet?


Rather liked this contribution to the debate on the alternative voting system for the UK:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn7j9sM_QXw

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, UK Politics

Time to join the Liberal Democrats? (If you’re a liberal living in Great Britain that is)


Looking in from the outside these days, British and particularly Liberal politics is clearly going through a period of significant and dynamic change.

The Liberal Democrats have had (and are still trying) to adjust to the realities of going from a party of protest to a party in power. To me, this process has also opened up the question (beyond the late night activist drinking debates and occasion think tank paper) as to the nature of the Party and what is the Liberal tradition.

For some Party members and the wider public this debate is bring to the fore, for the first time, just how much ideologue and principles underpin the Liberal Democrats (despite the odd, highly regrettable, pledge breaking trade off with the Tories for other policy gains). Even at a superficial level the newspapers have been talking about Orange book and Yellow book Liberals. Read the more in depth articles and the Liberal blogs and there you have the social Liberals arguing with the (left) radical Liberals, arguing with the (left) libertarian Liberals, hammering at the (right) libertarian Liberals, getting irritated by the classical Liberals, in turn being frustrated by the centrist Liberal democrats, while they for their part try to make sense of green Liberals. But each of these strands forms part of the ideological traditions which have shaped the Party. They have coexisted, intermingled and been sustained through members support for particular Party policies, Party groupings and approaches such as community politics.

For the Party and individual members committed to a rational and practical approach to politics the switch from opposition to government means having to address some painful realities about the contradictions and challenges within the different strands of Liberalism. But they are strands not separate ideologies and most individuals, as well as the Party, draw their personal programme from a range of these traditions. For instance, I tend to describe myself as a radical, social and green Liberal, but faced with looking at the Party not in opposition but in government I’m discovering how radical compared to social or social compared to green I am in this current economic climate.

The present debate around the Party’s identity has gone through the usual ‘is it or should it be’ on the centre left or in the centre (and occasionally even argued slightly to the ‘centre right’)? The press and opponents (and even Party members) like to simplify this first by phrasing the question as nearer Labour or the Tories. This was particularly the case in the early months of the coalition. Now the debate seems to be returning to the assertion that most Party members eventually make which is that they and the Party are Liberal, progressive (and concerned about poverty, fairness and individual freedom). Oddly, given the loss of distinctiveness in the early days of entering government, the real advantage now of being in government (even a coalition with the Tories) is that for the Party has the potential to be defined by its own core principles for the first time in post war Britain. The problem to overcome is that in many countries it’s the junior partner in a coalition that struggles to gain credit for its influence and can end up taking the blame for unpopular decisions.

The existence of such ideological Liberalism (rational & practical in all its forms) really has been a bit of a surprise to many in the outside world, who had always thought that the Lab/Tory accusation of ‘muddled middle with no roots’ had more than a grain of truth in it. However, unlike the other ‘big’ parties (who in most other political systems would have split into their separate and very different component parts long ago) the Lib Dems are in the main a coalition of Liberal traditions and community activism.

This mix of Liberal thinking is a strength and defining characteristic of the Lib Dems in Britain. This becomes very clear when you sit in a country in which these traditions are split and submerged within Parties across the political spectrum. In or out of government, whether for or against a particular policy, if you believe in progressive rational politics then a vibrant Liberal party encompassing the breadth of the Liberal tradition is something worth having and enriches the body politic.

With elections on the horizon, major policy arguments in the coalition, as well as the Party beginning to look outwards again, there has in recent weeks been a notably increase in discussion about the value of the Lib Dems, why you really should join (rejoin), and the positive impact the Party is having in government. Below is a cross section of such articles:

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/04/liberal-democrats-conservative

http://www.whatthehellhavethelibdemsdone.com/

http://richardkemp.wordpress.com/2011/04/03/i%e2%80%99m-proud-to-be-a-%e2%80%98cleggista%e2%80%99/

http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-labour-members-should-defect-to-the-liberal-democrats-23752.html

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/julianastle/100083736/reports-of-the-lib-dems’-death-have-been-greatly-exaggerated/

And Simon Hughes view on the coalition reported today:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/coalition-is-practical-agreement-2267684.html

And finally an interesting observation on the direction of the Labour Party:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/14/gillian-duffy-labour-mascot

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, UK Politics